Cadalyst

CAD Tech News (#86)

17 May, 2018 By: Cadalyst Staff


▶ CAD Workstation Form Factors 101: Shapes and Sizes

Herrera on Hardware: With so many types of workstation models on the market today — and new arrivals appearing all the time — it's best to start by sorting out the categories and learning what differentiates them.

By Alex Herrera

The prospects for PCs and workstations — both the markets and the platforms themselves — have rapidly diverged in recent years. Where the former is struggling with contracting volume and waning demand, the latter continues to push forward in both market growth and innovation. There's good reason for that dichotomy in fortunes, and the workstation's standing is reflected in a broad — and still expanding — portfolio of products designed to serve every possible use case a CAD professional can imagine.

The broader PC market's troubles stem from two key forces conspiring to depress demand for new machines. First of all, simpler alternative devices such as smartphones and tablets have captured the minds of more casual consumers, who find them adequate for modest e-mail and web browsing needs. And second, those with computing needs that still demand a PC realize they can go much longer between machine replacements than ever before. Forget the cost and hassle of buying and setting up a new machine every 18 months or so; now typical home and office users feel no urgency about swapping out a three-year-old machine that's doing the job well enough.

Neither force, however, applies to the demand for workstations serving CAD markets. The majority of professionals in manufacturing, design, architecture, and construction need the application-tuned performance and reliability of a workstation, and their insatiable demand for computation and visualization justifies maintaining a steady cycle of system upgrades.

The exploding portfolio of workstation models from which CAD pros can choose has been both a beneficiary of the market's momentum and a force driving it. Fifteen years ago, vendors may have pitched one or two deskbound workstation models; today, in contrast, high-volume suppliers including Dell, HP, and Lenovo offer ten or more. And that's not counting the ability to customize each model's hardware configuration to the ultimate degree. Designed for general-purpose visualization and computation, as well as optimized for specific use cases, today's workstation offerings vary widely in size, mobility, performance, power consumption, and ergonomics.

The range of workstation models serving CAD users has exploded in recent years.
The range of workstation models serving CAD users has exploded in recent years.

Today's Landscape for Workstation Models: How We Got Here

The modern workstation bears little resemblance to its progenitors, which pioneered the platform in the heyday of the 1980s. What were once big, expensive boxes running Unix operating systems on proprietary processors from Sun, IBM, SGI, or HP are now derived from the same technology and components that serve client and server PC platforms. Today, independent hardware vendors (IHVs) Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA provide the processors (CPUs and GPUs) that deliver the horsepower across the board: in PCs, workstations, and servers.

But sharing DNA does not mean the species are clones. Anything but, actually, as the two platforms are shaped differently to serve different needs and priorities. Historically, workstations tend to span the gap between servers and conventional client PCs: features they have in common with servers include reliability and dual-socket support, while they share virtually everything else with PCs. Add to that a mix of workstation-specific technologies, forms, and features, and the workstation stands apart from both its siblings.

Setting aside the age of the RISC/Unix workstation that ruled the roost in the '80s and early '90s — a valuable and interesting story certainly, but for this context, basically moot — let's start with the approximately twenty-year history of the modern workstation, built primarily on Windows, x86 CPUs (primarily Intel's, but also a bit of AMD's) and professional-caliber GPUs. Since its introduction in the late '90s, the workstation has seen many incremental improvements, along with a string of noteworthy extensions on the traditional deskside/desktop form factors.

Consider some of the following milestones in the workstation's evolution:

1998–2000: First workstations built on Windows (NT) and x86 processors emerge in two basic models, single-socket (1S) towers and dual-socket (2S) towers.

2003–2017: Spurred by Intel's Pentium-M processor, mobile workstations enter the scene. Over the next 15 years, the mobile will evolve from a single model (typically) to now five or more from a single vendor, differentiated by display, size, thickness, battery life, ergonomics, and performance.

2009: HP's seminal Z workstation line introduces the Entry 1S workstation (the Z200), followed by the first small–form factor version, the Z200 SFF.

2010: Remote server-side rack-mount workstations emerge.

2012: HP introduces the first all-in-one workstation, the Z1.

2016: Boxx, HP, and others take the SFF concept a big step further with "mini" workstations.

2017: 2-in-1 convertibles added to the mobile workstation portfolio.

At top, Dell's Precision workstation portfolio, circa 1997 — a far cry from the industry leader's broad lineup today (bottom). Images courtesy of Dell.

At top, Dell's Precision workstation portfolio, circa 1997 — a far cry from the industry leader's broad lineup today (bottom). Images courtesy of Dell.
At top, Dell's Precision workstation portfolio, circa 1997 — a far cry from the industry leader's broad lineup today (bottom). Images courtesy of Dell.

Read more »

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alex Herrera is a consultant focusing on high-performance graphics and workstations.

▶ The Model-Based Enterprise Demands Standards, Says CIMdata

The product lifecycle management (PLM) consulting firm warns that a lack of standards can stand in the way of successful institutionalization of MBE.

By Cadalyst Staff

Whether they create airplanes or apparel, companies involved in product design and manufacturing are increasingly embracing the concept of MBE. They face many uncertainties, however, beginning with the acronym itself: CIMdata Chairman John MacKrell explained during a recent CIMdata webinar that MBE may refer to model-based engineering — the integrated use of 3D digital models to manage data about a product throughout its lifecycle — but can also mean model-based enterprise.

CIMdata prefers the latter definition of MBE, described as "a vision to transform an enterprise's engineering, manufacturing, and aftermarket services through product data reuse and derived context, rather than interpreting inputs and recreating the models and drawings."

But sorting out terminology does not end the confusion. Many organizations are just starting their journey of MBE adoption, and standards and best practices are still evolving. "Not many people have institutionalized it … we're really just becoming aware of how to do this," said MacKrell. He explained that many companies are in an exploratory stage, asking questions such as, "How do I get away from drawings in production, how do I use the model more intelligently, how do I do virtual reality, how do I do augmented reality — and really, extract just a huge amount more out of the model?"

Although standards are something of a mixed bag at this point, MacKrell stressed that they are essential for success. "Without standards for MBE, it's really difficult to understand how we're going to communicate our designs, how we're going to build and maintain our products, how we're going to work across enterprises." Read more »

▶ WHAT’S NEW


AutoCAD Video Tips: Calling All AutoCAD Center Marks
Mastering center marks is easier than ever, thanks to changes introduced in AutoCAD 2017. Join AutoCAD tipster Lynn Allen as she takes you through the ins and outs of creating and editing, so you can become a supreme center mark and centerline guru! Watch the video »

CAD Manager Column: Spring into Standards, Part 4 — Sell, Train, Audit, and Enforce to Make Standards Work
The work of CAD standards doesn't end with implementation — you must stay vigilant as you enter "maintenance mode." Read more »

New KeyShot Viewer Supports Interactive Product Design Reviews
A new application from Luxion enables users to experience interactive visualizations without high-powered hardware — or a copy of KeyShot. Read more »


About the Author: Cadalyst Staff

Cadalyst Staff

Add comment

Note: Comments are moderated and will appear live after approval by the site moderator.

AutoCAD Tips!

Lynn Allen

In her easy-to-follow, friendly style, long-time Cadalyst contributing editor Lynn Allen guides you through a new feature or time-saving trick in every episode of her popular AutoCAD Video Tips. Subscribe to the free Cadalyst Video Picks newsletter, and we'll notify you every time a new video tip is published. All exclusively from Cadalyst!

Follow Lynn on TwitterFollow Lynn on Twitter


Poll
Do you use social media — such as Facebook or Twitter updates, YouTube videos, or discussion forums — for work-related purposes?
Yes, I regularly use such resources for work-related purposes.
Yes, but on a limited or infrequent basis.
No, because my employer frowns upon or prohibits doing so.
No, because I don’t have the time or interest.
Submit Vote



Download Cadalyst Magazine Special Edition