Conveyor Manufacturer Keeps Things Moving (Cadalyst Daily Archive)

16 Oct, 2006 By: Kenneth Wong

Hytrol's Autodesk-based engineered-to-order system employs 12 rules to generate 25,000 product options


Which would you rather manage: 25,000 product configurations or 12 engineering rules? Unless you're inexplicably addicted to complicated spreadsheets, you'd undoubtedly pick 12 over 25,000. In fact, a dozen well-developed design formulas may be all you need to drive 25,000 product iterations. That's what conveyor manufacturer Hytrol Conveyor discovered.

Loberg's Legacy
At a friend's urging, Tom Loberg, a 30-year-old machine shop operator who had survived the Great Depression, built a modest conveyor system for handling bags of seed and feed. It was the first product of what would later become Hytrol Conveyor, founded by Loberg in 1947. Six decades later, the late Loberg's legacy is a thriving international business, with market presence in 13 countries in addition to the United States. Working behind the scenes, Hytrol equipment helps companies such as Barnes & Noble, Costco, FedEx and Office Max keep shipping and sorting operations running smoothly. The company produces a variety of conveying and sorting machines that can be customized according to their physical dimensions, set-ups (horizontal, incline or portable), the types of curves and belts involved and other specifications. That translates to a bloated BOM (bill of materials) archive of more than 1 million products.  



About the Author: Kenneth Wong

AutoCAD Tips!

Lynn Allen

In her easy-to-follow, friendly style, long-time Cadalyst contributing editor Lynn Allen guides you through a new feature or time-saving trick in every episode of her popular AutoCAD Video Tips. Subscribe to the free Cadalyst Video Picks newsletter, and we'll notify you every time a new video tip is published. All exclusively from Cadalyst!

Follow Lynn on TwitterFollow Lynn on Twitter

Do you use any augmented or virtual reality (AR or VR) technologies in your workflow?
Not yet, but we are planning to implement it.
No, but we think these technologies could hold value for us.
No; these technologies do not hold value for us.
Submit Vote

Download Cadalyst Magazine Special Edition