Readers Balk at Yearly AutoCAD Upgrades

30 Jun, 2006 By: Sara Ferris

Subscription pricing can offer savings, but annual releases lead to headaches for many users, our feedback shows


A year is not enough, at least when it comes to the timing of major software releases. That was the consensus of the many Cadalyst readers who wrote to respond to my May editorial, which discussed how Autodesk has structured its subscription program to be a clearly better deal than upgrading at will. Previously, the rule of thumb was to upgrade every other AutoCAD release, which meant an upgrade every three to four years. Given an annual software release cycle, most readers told us they prefer to make an actual upgrade every three releases. For those not on subscription, that means paying to upgrade just before their current version is retired by Autodesk.  Read more >>p>


Cimmetry Systems Certifies New Channel Partners
Company adds more than 30 resellers in Canada, Europe and Asia.  Read more >>

Schneider Electric and IGE+XAO Group Sign Partnership
Companies team up to enable interoperability of SISpro Building and SEE Building LT software.  Read more >>

Open API Available with Tekla Structures 12
Offering designed to advance development and adoption of open BIM.  Read more >>


General Software: Maple Toolbox for MATLAB
New Maplesoft product enables MATLAB users to tap the potential of Maple 10. 

GIS: InfoSewer V4
Upgrade from MWH Soft provides wastewater systems design and management capabilities to ESRI ArcGIS users.  Read more >>

CAE: TGrid 4.0, GAMBIT 2.3 and 3Matic-for-Fluent 1.0
Fluent introduces upgrades to preprocessing capabilities. 

About the Author: Sara Ferris

AutoCAD Tips!

Lynn Allen

In her easy-to-follow, friendly style, long-time Cadalyst contributing editor Lynn Allen guides you through a new feature or time-saving trick in every episode of her popular AutoCAD Video Tips. Subscribe to the free Cadalyst Video Picks newsletter, and we'll notify you every time a new video tip is published. All exclusively from Cadalyst!

Follow Lynn on TwitterFollow Lynn on Twitter

Do you use any augmented or virtual reality (AR or VR) technologies in your workflow?
Not yet, but we are planning to implement it.
No, but we think these technologies could hold value for us.
No; these technologies do not hold value for us.
Submit Vote

Download Cadalyst Magazine Special Edition