Early Design CAD Design Testing & Analysis Collaboration Hardware   3D Printers   Displays/Monitors   Graphics Cards   Wide-Format Printers/Scanners   Workstations Tips & Tools
Manufacturing

# Constraint Limits in Inventor 2011

23 Sep, 2010

### Avatech Tricks Tutorial: Reach new limits with Inventor constraints by using the new capability to define limits to constraints.

Editor's note: This tutorial courtesy of Avatech Solutions.

Assembly constraints determine how components in an assembly fit together. As you apply constraints, you remove degrees of freedom, restricting the ways components can move. Autodesk Inventor 2011 allows you to assign maximum, minimum, and resting position values that specify the allowable range of motion for a constraint.

In this tutorial, I will demonstrate the process of adding constraint limits to new and existing constraints.

Identifying and Applying Constraint Limits

For the first part of this demonstration, I will be focusing on this actuator and defining the allowable stroke motion. As you can see, I have a hard limit at the back of the cylinder, and another limit where the linkage will collide.

Using the Measure command, I can determine the maximum allowable stroke for this design. Now I want to apply these limits to a constraint.

We will add the mate constraint as usual, selecting the opposite mating faces. Inventor 2011 has a new option available in the Constraint dialog box that allows users to define limits to constraints. Access the new option by clicking the More button, at the lower-right corner of the dialog.

The Constraint dialog box will then expand, exposing the new limit settings. You can determine a resting position and set a maximum and minimum limit for the constraint.

The resting limit uses the current offset value to determine the default position. I will enter the maximum limit I measured earlier, and leave the minimum value at zero. I then click OK to apply the new constraint.

As we drag the arm and test the constraint, you will see the limits restricting the movement of the components. A constraint with limits is identified in the browser by a +/- symbol.

Veteran Inventor users might ask why we just don't use the contact-sensitive approach. Contact sets require physical contact with other components to determine the limits. In contrast, constraint limits use assigned values to limit movement and do not require physical contact. Remember, we wanted to create limits based on avoiding contact. Constraint limits also require far less computer resources, allowing designers to create larger and more complex assembly simulations.

It is very easy to establish multiple constraint limits and create complex motion simulations.

The next task in our demonstration is to limit the rotation angle of the chassis. I want to limit the rotation to 60 degrees on each side of zero. I already have an angle constraint locking the position of the chassis. To add a limit, I simply expand the More option and input the desired limitations. I will use the current angle value to determine the resting position. After applying the constraint, I will rotate the chassis and observe the limits I set. If I release the chassis, it snaps back to the resting position.

Summation

The new constraint limits option enhances the existing Inventor constraint workflow. Applying constraint limits based on a known or measured value is a handy improvement.

# About the Author: Rusty Belcher

Note: Comments are moderated and will appear live after approval by the site moderator.

 AutoCAD Tips! In her easy-to-follow, friendly style, long-time Cadalyst contributing editor Lynn Allen guides you through a new feature or time-saving trick in every episode of her popular AutoCAD Video Tips. Subscribe to the free Cadalyst Video Picks newsletter, and we'll notify you every time a new video tip is published. All exclusively from Cadalyst!

Poll
Do you use any augmented or virtual reality (AR or VR) technologies in your workflow?
 Yes. Not yet, but we are planning to implement it. No, but we think these technologies could hold value for us. No; these technologies do not hold value for us.