Move Coincident Nodes in Femap

31 Dec, 2013 By: Alastair Robertson

Femap Tips and Tricks: The Move Only, No Merge option will help you move nodes to be coincident within a tolerance.

Editor's Note: This tutorial courtesy of Siemens PLM.

Sometimes you may need to set up a model to have a set of coincident nodes which can be connected together using spring or gap elements. To help prepare such a model, Femap includes a method of moving nodes to be coincident within a tolerance. This is the Move Only, No Merge option which can be found in the Check/Merge Coincident Node dialog.

In the menu, navigate to Tools > Check > Coincident Nodes, then select the nodes to check in the Entity Selection dialog box.

The Move Only, No Merge option will move nodes found to be within the coincident node tolerance. In the Check/Merge Coincident dialog, enter a suitable number for the Tolerance.

Click on the Move To button to control how the nodes move: higher ID to lower, lower ID to higher, or both to the midpoint of the distance between them. Next, select the Action button and set that to Move Only, No Merge.

You can check to see which nodes have been selected for the move operation by clicking the Preview button.

Click Done and OK to execute the move operation.

You can watch the video of this Femap tip on YouTube.

About the Author: Alastair Robertson

Alastair Robertson

Add comment

Note: Comments are moderated and will appear live after approval by the site moderator.

AutoCAD Tips!

Lynn Allen

In her easy-to-follow, friendly style, long-time Cadalyst contributing editor Lynn Allen guides you through a new feature or time-saving trick in every episode of her popular AutoCAD Video Tips. Subscribe to the free Cadalyst Video Picks newsletter, and we'll notify you every time a new video tip is published. All exclusively from Cadalyst!

Follow Lynn on TwitterFollow Lynn on Twitter

Do you use any augmented or virtual reality (AR or VR) technologies in your workflow?
Not yet, but we are planning to implement it.
No, but we think these technologies could hold value for us.
No; these technologies do not hold value for us.
Submit Vote

Download Cadalyst Magazine Special Edition