What's in a Name? Little to No Difference in a Processor's SKU Can Translate to a Big Impact on Performance, Part 1
Herrera on Hardware: Compact fixed and mobile workstations often dictate lower-power, lower-performance components not always easy to recognize on a datasheet.
In recent months, this column has fixed its attention often on the evolving make-up of the fixed workstation. It’s a justifiable focus, as the platform has experienced a particularly rapid pace of innovation and differentiation in the past few years — most notably manifested in the proliferation of new, shrunken form factors. Though often equated with the pseudonym of “desktop,” the fixed workstation has in reality sat most often desk-side in a traditional tower chassis. A decade ago, a machine that truly deserved the desktop designation, the Small Form Factor (SFF) workstations, began its rise to prominence, now comparable in sales volume to the traditional tower.
The last few years, however, have seen the workstation options shrink further, with the introduction of sub-SFF models enticing CAD users looking to streamline their desks and willing to give up some degree of performance and capacity. With its Z2 Mini, HP was the most aggressive of the big three (Dell, HP, and Lenovo) to drive the downsizing trend. Lenovo jumped on board as well, even out-shrinking the Mini with its own Tiny, and recently launching the Ultra workstation, fitting in size between the Tiny and a conventional SFF machine. And Dell responded with the Compact, comparable to the Ultra in size, and so far steering clear of marketing something in the ultra-small neighborhood of a Tiny. The graph below charts the chassis volumes for these new sub-SFF workstations (normalized to the size of a typical deskside tower, HP’s Z2). Keep in mind that for the Ultra and smaller, an external power brick is required, one far larger than the AC adapter of an SFF or tower machine.
How some of DHL’s sub-SFF fixed workstations stack up to conventional tower and SFF volume, normalized to HP’s Z2 tower. Data source: HP, Dell and Lenovo.
This column’s covered the Mini and SFF workstations in recent months, with one common thread clear: there’s an unavoidable tradeoff between size, capacity and performance. The obvious one? Shrink the volume and maximum capacity declines with it, as there’s simply less space to stuff components. But as discussed as well in those articles, the max capacity (e.g., memory and storage) of even the Mini is surprisingly ample, beyond what most CAD users require. Rather, the more significant tradeoff than size and capacity is between size and performance. Higher performance means more watts, and more watts means more heat, heat that a bigger chassis can more efficiently dissipate. Ultimately, smaller machines are more likely to have performance throttled back to avoid failures from exceeding thermal limits.
In the next two columns, we'll look at the two primary workstation processors primarily responsible for the level of visual computing performance CAD workflows ultimately achieve — the CPU and the GPU — and how their specifications vary to operate within the thermal constraints of the more densely packed sub-SFF models. In addition, we’ll look at how seemingly subtle differences in those SKUs — or even no difference whatsoever — can have substantial impacts on achievable throughput for typical CAD workloads.
CPU: For the 12th Gen Core i9-12900 and 12900K, the Difference is Far Bigger than One Letter
Consider two of the premium SKUs from Intel’s most recent 12th Gen Core family, a product line that will dominate workstation sales in the coming months (though will have its own 13th Gen Core successor ramping in workstations shortly). The Core i9-12900K appears as the top end CPU option currently for most single-socket, mainstream deskside towers and SFF workstations, but a sub-SFF model like Lenovo’s Ultra sensibly offers the 12900 as its most premium option. The table below contrasts the most salient metrics for the 12900 vs. 12900K, a mere one letter distinction in SKUs.
Clock rates — and commensurate power — the difference between a i9-12900 and i9-12900K. Data source: Intel.
Now, if you were to quickly glean the highlights from their respective datasheets, you might not notice the most salient difference between the two SKUs: the P-core base frequency. Intel’s marketing collateral will summarize clock specs for the two models with “Up to 5.0 GHz” (the 12900) and “Up to 5.2 GHz” (the 12900K). No big difference, right? On the surface, then, few would see that difference as a critical criterion in their selection of the CPU, and thereby not critical in the selection of workstation form factor.
CONTINUE READING. Alex Herrera next ran Cinebench and SPEC's SPECworkstation tests. Find out more how each performed and how to interpret the results. Read more >>
From Our Sponsors
Sponsored: The Equipped Mold Designer:
NX Mold Connect = Cloud Data Management Made Easy
Part 5. Follow this team of designers as they learn how to use NX Mold Connect. In this article, they are moving forward with the project and using Siemens’ Connector to manage workflows in the cloud versus bogging down their desktop systems as they work with very large data files. By Cynthia Kustush Read more >>
Sponsored: What is PDM and Why Do You Need It?
If you’re searching for data in different locations, it might be time to implement a PDM system. Read more >>
WHAT'S NEW FROM CADALYST
Uniting Mechanical and Electronic Engineering in Product Development
Simultaneous collaboration brings model-based design to life by allowing mechanical and electrical engineers to design together. By Cadalyst Staff Read more >>
Civil Engineering: Robots are Coming to a Construction Site Near You!
AEC firms employ autonomous equipment to gain efficiency, productivity. By Andrew G. RoeRead more >>
CAD Manager's Series: CAD Management Constants by Robert Green
Upgrade Decisions. Build your case for software upgrades with a clear ROI and training plan.Read more >>
File Security. From accidental deletion to disaster preparedness, file security should be one of your top concerns.Read more >>
CAD Manager's Back-to-Basics Bootcamp
Sometimes CAD managers get so far into the weeds of specific projects that it's easy to forget the basic skills that are needed as CAD managers. In our Back-to-Basics Boot Camp, we’ll help you focus on the key skills and strategies that every CAD manager needs to function at maximum efficiency.
While many things change as time goes on, there are key parts of being a CAD manager that remain the same. What are they and how do you keep improving on those things to build success? By Robert Green Watch the video >>
Mobile vs. Desktop Workstations for CAD
The Evolving Role of the Mobile Workstation
It comes down to physics — a deskside can always outperform a mobile workstation. Cadalyst hardware expert, Alex Herrera, looks under the hood of both to break down the pros and cons of each form factor.