Which CAD Workstation Buyers Can Benefit from Threadripper?

30 Dec, 2017 By: Alex Herrera

Herrera on Hardware: An analysis of AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper illustrates why a workstation CPU is not a one-size-fits-all proposition.


Zen Clears First Major Hurdle in Workstation CPU Market Quest

Intel can no longer claim blanket superiority over AMD in workstation-caliber CPUs — and that’s a tremendous accomplishment for the No. 2 vendor. After years of anticipation, we have finally gotten to see Zen CPU technology driving a workstation, and the results prove it a compelling and credible contender for workstation usage. Testing shows Threadripper can excel at highly threaded, professional-caliber workloads, and its single-thread performance doesn’t lag much behind the highest-GHz CPU Intel can support.

However, while AMD has certainly cleared a tough hurdle in its quest to again contend in the market for workstation-caliber CPUs, there’s an important caveat. While we contrasted Threadripper with the best single-thread processor Intel can offer, it’s important to note the Intel CPU brands we did not compare with Threadripper in this exercise: the X-series Core i9 and Xeon W, the latter being Intel’s primary CPU line targeting Premium 1S workstation models.

Unlike Core i7, both the Core i9 and Xeon W brands extend all the way up to 18 cores. So OEMs could already be marketing an 18-core CPU in a workstation, but they chose not to. Part of the reason was Intel’s delayed release of the newer and workstation-preferred Basin Falls platform supporting what Intel calls “High Core Count” (HCC) Xeon W SKUs. But the lack of urgency is also a reflection of that aforementioned status quo in CPU core counts, where the market has to date seen a relative trickle in volume for core counts beyond 4 to 6. Now, I’ve speculated that the emergence of Threadripper would raise the interest in getting Intel’s HCC SKUs exposed in workstations. In fact, that scenario won’t be a hypothetical one much longer, because for the first time, one (or likely all) of the trio will be making that 18-core Xeon W — with quad-channel memory akin to Threadripper — available in a premium 1S deskside workstation early in 2018.

Lenovo’s announced ThinkStation P520 is expected to ship in the coming weeks, built around the aforementioned launch of the HCC-optimized Basin Falls platform. And though the other two have not announced a similar step, it would be no surprise to see HP and Dell announce availability of 18-core SKUs as well. On the bullish side, however, given its substantially lower price (at least at retail levels today), I expect Threadripper can still duke it out with 18-core Xeon W’s, if not in all-out performance then in the price-to-performance ratio. (And if all goes according to plan, I expect a chance to explore just that with testing and analysis of the ThinkStation P520 with an 18-core Xeon W, so stay tuned.)

Lenovo will have an 18-core Intel Xeon W available in its ThinkStation P520, expected in the first quarter of 2018. Image courtesy of Lenovo.

2017 proved a successful coming-out party for Zen. Processors like Threadripper — and shortly, Epyc and possibly Ryzen — are now competing for CAD workstation CPU sockets once again. It’s achieved both credibility and a critical foothold by signing on premium workstation vendors like Boxx (with both Threadripper and Epyc). But Zen’s battle is far from over, and 2018 could prove to be a breakthrough year — if, that is, AMD can clear the next hurdle and bring on a high-volume vendor like Dell, HP, or Lenovo. Doing so means AMD needs to prove that the technological achievement in Zen, now proven in Threadripper, will be complemented by comparable, long-term execution in products and commitment to the marketplace. The latter issues are critical to both high-volume OEMs and high-volume customers, who both must weigh the value of bringing on another platform against the substantial overhead of doing so.

1 2 3 

About the Author: Alex Herrera

Alex Herrera

Add comment


Re: Which CAD Workstation Buyers Can Benefit from Thre...
by: dmc1089
January 17, 2018 - 1:02am
Unfortunately AutoCAD does not seem to care much about multiple cores. I use Acad, revit and navisworks all day long and am always watching it using 100% of 1 core while the others sit idly by doing nothing. 5 different systems I7-3930 and i7-4790 (clocked to 4.5) plus a surface pro and two Lenovo laptops (I-7 Yoga with ) all except surface have 32 g of ram. Faster speed seems to help more than number of cores.
More News and Resources from Cadalyst Partners

For Mold Designers! Cadalyst has an area of our site focused on technologies and resources specific to the mold design professional. Sponsored by Siemens NX.  Visit the Equipped Mold Designer here!

For Architects! Cadalyst has an area of our site focused on technologies and resources specific to the building design professional. Sponsored by HP.  Visit the Equipped Architect here!